Translate

Thursday, November 29, 2012

Step 3 of Project 3


My unit did not proceed as expected, simply because of the realistic structure of a school schedule.  I had planned for significantly more time to actually write, but when it came down to it, my teacher needed to move on and begin teaching the next unit, and so I had to figure out how to combine my remaining three lessons for my unit into the large block of time that we have on Friday’s specifically for Language Arts.  This was very difficult for me, because I had to figure out how to structure this period of time in a way that did not just have my ten year olds sitting and writing for three hours.  I needed them to write, and I needed them to go through the brainstorming, first draft, proof reading, revising, and second draft pieces of the writing pencil that represents our writing process, but I knew that if I tried to do this all in one day, I would add to the stress and the anxiety of writing that I knew most of my students already felt.  I wanted my unit to celebrate writing, and to allow students to see how enjoyable writing could be, and it was very difficult for me to figure out how to keep this process positive when it neared the end. 

This is the writing pencil that I created for my
students that represents the 9 phases of the writing
process.  It worked great as an motivational tool for
my students, which was interesting to me
because that was not my intention with this tool.
This last day of my unit did end up going over very smoothly, and my students did a beautiful job of writing, and I could tell that most of them really were enjoying what I was asking them to do.  What I did have a very difficult time with was trying not to feel discouraged by the work they ended up turning in to me.  I was thrilled with their actual writing, and I could tell that some students had a thorough understanding of the show don’t tell style of writing.  However, most of my students did not include the specific pieces that were asked of them in their final piece.  I know that they are capable of doing it, because they had already done it for me, but in individual pieces of short writing.  But it was nowhere to be found in their final pieces!  I even specifically chose to have students self assess themselves on a checklist as opposed to a rubric, so that they could tell me if they had included what was asked of them.  All of my students checked yes, that they included all of the pieces.  In the majority of their writing, I was shocked at this, because I could not see it in their work, so I didn’t know if they truly thought they included the pieces, or if they just checked things off of a list just to do it.  This was so frustrating!  I do not want to discourage students from writing, and I truly do want it to be a celebration, because it should be, but sometimes I am just not really sure where to go.  My unit is now over, but I feel as if my students are not ready for that to happen.  The constraints of a school schedule are there, and so I am not able to keep going back to this piece of writing, but I feel like the students are not ready at all to move on.  I am still struggling with this, and am really unsure of what I should do that is best for the students, because that is what is most important to me.

Project 3: Step 3


Step 3:
·      To what extent you were expected to follow a scripted curriculum, or add your own ideas to a curriculum that already exists, or create a unit that is entirely new?
o   For the most part, I was expected to follow a very strict scripted curriculum in its format, but I was able to adapt and interject my own teaching ideas to enhance the unit. This allowed me to teach new readings, rather than the ones suggested, just in the same format as the curriculum models.
·      What was unproblematic and/or challenging about planning a unit in the context?
o   This was fairly unproblematic for me and the students because I was able to still teach in the style that we have been using all year, just adding my own ideas, activities, and stories to enhance the students learning as well as make it more enjoyable to teach. The students benefit from this style as well, because it is consistent with what they are used to using.
·      What obstacles did you face? How did you overcome them?
o   The biggest obstacle I faced was running out of time to accomplish everything I would have like to finish. I overcame this by having to plan better as we progressed through the unit, to manage myself while teaching each lesson, and to make sure I was able to choose which parts of the lesson were most important and necessary.
·      What dilemmas did you face and how did you manage them?
o   Due to the style of the basal reader, the students express their dislike for the Reading Street style of weekly tests. At times, the student complaints became a dilemma. But I was able to manage these dilemmas by helping the students understand what is expected of them, the program, and the school district, and the reasons for why we take the weekly tests.
·      What enabled you to be successful?
o   I was able to be successful by my resourcefulness while teaching and my abilities to adapt lessons on the go to make for better literacy learning.
·      Did the unit proceed as you expected? Why or why not?
o   For the most part, the unit did go as expected. There were a few changes that were made, but none that were excessive or altered the direction that I had envisioned the lesson to go in. This was able to be accomplished due to adaptability and listening to the ways in which the students wanted to learn best.
·      ·      What surprises or “ah ha” moments did you experience?

o   I was surprised by the student distaste for the style in which the Reading Street program is set up, but also their appreciation for differentiation away from the program. When I was able to take the skills associated with the program and implement them with different reading and writings other than the ones in the book, the students enjoyed and responded to that style of learning much better than working with the Reading Street program.
·      What do you still need to learn about teaching in the area, about your developing your core practice, and about teaching literacy in general?
o   I still need to learn ways in which I can adapt the curriculum so that all students can learn in ways that are fun, appropriate, and engaging for the differing levels of readers. It was a lot to try to take in as I was teaching the lesson in the moment, and making adaptations as I went. Now having taught a lesson like so, I can better prepare myself for the ways in which different students learn, and will be able to plan and use differentiated strategies for specific learners. I would like to continue to learn new ways to teach literacy to a variety of diverse literacy learners, new techniques, styles, book clubs, and materials needed to do so.

Thursday, November 15, 2012

Koss Part E Reflections


What did students learn and which students struggled with the lesson? 
-After my first two lessons, I realized that I was going to have a much more difficult time than I thought with explaining the different characteristics that made up Fables to my students.  The first lesson was based around figuring out what characteristics make up a Fable, such as: animals are the main characters, animals possess human qualities, personification, short, quick plots, and morals.  The first lesson was based around building vocabulary and making sure that they got the basics down before we jumped right into having them find out what a Fable consisted of by themselves.  Students struggled with differentiating between what a Fable was and what a Fairy Tale was.  I wasn't surprised by this and thought the conception might arise so I gave them examples of both.  They just didn't grasp onto the idea of what a moral was.  During my second lesson, we had a day of centers.  Some students did a reader's theater, while others did guided reading with me, and the last group looked at a fable that was broken up into different parts and had to form it correctly by punctuation and capital letters.  Students had a good time at these centers and it seemed like the only part they struggled with was staying on task.  Students that weren't constantly watched wanted to be off task.  Having three centers and only myself at times in the room really made it easy for kids to get off task and not follow the directions of the centers.  Students had to do a think-pair-share activity about what characteristics were present and noticed from the first lesson with the Fables they ready on day 2.  This was difficult for them.  They were able to use their notes and I even posted the Fable Chart we started the day before up for examples and they still struggled.


What are alternate reads (interpretations) of your students’ performance or products?
- When looking at other interpretations of my students' performances, I talked with my MT about what were some others ways to really get students involved and staying on task.  What we were able to figure out were to have students have their own copies of the literature we were reading so they could follow along, and stop more often to draw them to where these characteristics came up.  I also decided to give students their own Fable Charts that I created so that it was a hard copy right in front of them.  Students seemed to get  better grasp of the concepts once I put it in front of them and didn't have them just writing it in their journals.  From what my MT was telling me, the best way to make sure students stayed on task was to quietly roam the room during centers and ask questions to make sure they were on task.  Th problem with this was that it took away from guided reading and I couldn't listen to every student read, which I wanted to do.

What did you learn about your students’ literacy practices that extend beyond your objectives?
- What I was able to take out from my students literacy practices was that a lot of good voice was used when reading at reader's theater center and the guided reading center.  Student's would change their voices when it came to different characters and use different emphasis when it came to different punctuation within quotes.  I also saw a lot of development from students about how they figured out what the moral of the story was.  I saw them really start to think about how the lesson/moral was intended to move beyond the story and into everyday life.  This was probably the best seen practice beyond my objectives.

When and how will you re-teach the material to students who need additional support?
-When it comes to my whole group lessons, I changed my practice by having students have their own copies of the Fable, listen first to how I read the story and then have them take turns reading aloud, and let the discussion develop more on its own for understanding the characteristics of a Fable.  At first I was hesitant to let there be any quiet time because I thought they just didn't understand what was going on.  I decided to start asking more questions to lead their thinking to what were trying to get at for the day.  Having them write down at multiple parts of the lesson also allowed for them to go back and bring into discussion any thoughts, ideas, or questions they had.  When it came to center's I mostly just changed up the guided reading center by giving students their own copies of the text and allowing them stop and write down ideas during the read as well.  I think that I need to allow for more time during my T-P-S exercises and that is something I will consider if teaching the lessons again.


If you were to teach this same lesson again, what would you do differently and how do you think the changes would improve students’ learning?
- As stated above, I would mostly work on giving students more time during our reflection process.  Because of the time restraints we have through our day, and that we have kids from 3 other class rooms for reading, time management was my biggest struggle.  I couldn't go over the time limit so I sometimes had to rush to bring closure to my lesson, or take away time from my next one by finishing up or reviewing at the start of my next lesson.  I feel that students learning was definitely there for these lessons, but maybe the unfamiliarity of the class put pressure on some students to really express themselves or feel comfortable enough to raise their hands and share what they were thinking,

What are you learning so far about implementing your ‘core practice’ and what do you
 need to do to continue your professional learning?     
- When it comes to implementing my core practices, I feel that this was one of my better areas of teaching my lessons.  Students really responded well to the idea of working with Fables and I think the techniques I used to present them to my students really worked out well.  I feel that if I were to teach these same lessons to my class, instead of our reading groups, that I would have seen even more discussion and development of the characteristics of Fables and better involvement all around for whole group discussions.  Students from my reading group though did a great job in tying in all the aspects that I wanted though, even though I felt like I was pulling teeth sometimes.  But all in all it was a fun lesson not only for me but my students as well, and I feel that they did a really good job through it all.     

Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Kelsey Inquiry 2 Part E


What did students learn and which students struggled with the lesson?
In this lesson, students learned what “show don’t tell writing” is, and why it is important.  They learned that when you show as opposed to tell in your writing, you are giving the reader a chance to visualize, or paint a picture in their mind about what is being written about.  Students learned that an important piece of this style of writing is the inclusion of sensory details.  There were some students that struggled with this lesson, and those students were the ones who do not see writing in a positive way.  I noticed that it was hard for those students to break through that barrier of disliking writing, and so their learning suffered.
What are alternate reads (interpretations) of your students’ performance or products?
When looking at student performance and products, it has become clearer to me that there are so many factors that I need to take into consideration before I make the assumption that students are not engaged, or not understanding.  Sometimes there are things going on with the student’s personal life that have nothing to do with you or the way you are teaching, but are really affecting the way that particular student is learning on a given day.  I have realized that this kind of stuff happens, especially with 10 year olds, and I need to really learn to not take that personally, and to not let it drag me down while teaching the lesson.  With students products, the reading of directions has been an uphill battle.  As a teacher, when you model something, give clear expectations, and read the directions with your students, it is hard to accept that some students still did not perform well, not because they are not capable of doing so, but because they chose not to read the directions, or they were still unclear of what was expected of them.  This has been something that I have been struggling with, and I am really working on things that I can do to improve this.  Also, a lot of the pieces of writing that I used to assess my students were assignments that were done at home as homework due to time restraints in school.  I feel as if this is very important to acknowledge when thinking about alternate interpretations, because sometimes homework is forgotten, and rushed on the bus, or before class starts, or hurried through because a student wanted to move onto a different activity.  This is something that can really influence quality of work, and when something is rushed, it is not an example of a student’s best possible work.
What did you learn about your students’ literacy practices that extend beyond your objectives?
I learned that my students are passionate about language arts, and that they all have the desire to share their ideas and to share their writing with other people.  I learned that the dislike of writing comes not from the actual physical act of writing, but in the restriction of ideas.  I learned that giving students interesting topics to write about, and putting up less restrictions and letting students choose what they would like to write about opens up a lot more students to the idea of being passionate and enthusiastic writers.
When and how will you re-teach the material to students who need additional support?
The idea of showing and not telling in your writing will be something that is touched on every single day for the remainder of the unit.  For students needing additional support, I will give that to them on an individual basis if I notice that they continue to struggle in the second piece of writing that they will complete on Day 3. 
  If you were to teach this same lesson again, what would you do differently and how do you think the changes would improve students’ learning?
If I were to teach this lesson again, I would have written a piece for the students to see that modeled an example of show don’t tell writing for how I ate the orange.  The reason why I did not take this step initially was because I worried that I would write about something that I would not actually end up doing when I ate the orange for the students to watch.  After actually having the experience of this lesson, I now understand that having that piece of writing to model for them would have really helped to enforce the idea of how you can write about any situation using the show don’t tell style of writing, and I think the modeled example would have helped to clear up some confusion that students had when I asked them to write about the experience that they all had about me eating an orange.
What did you learn so far about implementing your ‘core practice’ and what do you need to do to continue your professional learning?
I need to give students the opportunity to actually take their pieces of writing that they did for my assessment purposes and turn them into final drafts.  In order to really make the most out of this writing unit, I need to have the opportunity to allow students to channel their enthusiasm and their new passion about writing into a published piece that can be shared with others, because I really now understand that sharing is a huge piece of writing, and if there is a chance to share your writing with others, you will be a lot more motivated to produce high quality work.

Sunday, October 28, 2012

Matt Jablonski's Inquiry 2 Part E


·        What did students learn and which students struggled with the lesson?
-After teaching my first two lessons, the students learned how to identify the settings and themes of stories, as well as techniques and strategies for finding the meanings of unknown words. The concept of setting came fairly easy for most, if not all students. The themes of the stories took the students longer that I anticipated. From prior practices, the students did a fairly good job at using dictionaries and glossaries to identify the meaning of unknown words, using contexts clues to find meanings was slightly more difficult for some students. The students who struggled to identify the themes and use context clues to find the meanings of unknown words were the students who seem to be struggling most with reading and writing this year. I believe these students are listening while I am reading, and are doing the readings when asked to read with a partner, but I believe the students are not actively reading. These students could barely retell me a summary of the stories other than the main parts from the story. I would guess these students are just reading to get through the material, rather than reading with a purpose to identify theme and unknown words. I plan to help these students by keeping them accountable while reading by informing them they will have to read to find themes and identify words. Worksheets can be used to keep these students accountable for actively reading.
·        What are alternate reads (interpretations) of your students’ performance or products?
-Other alternate interpretations of the students' performance could be as simple as the students did not listen while I was reading out loud, or were not reading when they were given time to partner read. Later on in the week, the students will be asked to complete a unit worksheet that specifically asks them to interpret the themes, settings, and meanings of unknown words of a unknown text. Since the students know this is the worksheet/quiz they will be receiving a grade on, it is my hope that they will in fact do the readings and be able to identify all of these components.
·        What did you learn about your students’ literacy practices that extend beyond your objectives?
-I learned that the students' literacy practices can be very limited or very extensive, based on the students literacy abilities. Those students whom I know are strong readers, and read for enjoyment regularly, found the objectives of the lessons came very easily. I learned that for these students, the settings, themes, and search for meaning of unknown words is practiced naturally while reading, while the students whom do not read regularly must be taught to look to identify these things. For some students, active reading come naturally, while others need to be taught to actively read.
·        When and how will you re-teach the material to students who need additional support?
-As the week progresses and new reading strategies and skills are introduced while reading new texts, the students will be asked and challenged to identify the themes, settings, and unknown words of all the stories in addition to the other skills and strategies being taught. At the end of the week, the students take a weekly reading test that will assess their abilities to accomplish these reading skills and strategies. For those students who need additional support, each days readings, writings, and worksheets will challenge the students to practice and familiarize themselves with the reading skills and strategies.
·        If you were to teach this same lesson again, what would you do differently and how do you think the changes would improve students’ learning?
-If I were to teach the lesson again, I would spend less time on the skills and strategies the students seem to have a strong grasp on (setting and using a dictionary and glossary) and spend more time working on how to identify themes and using context clues to identify unknown words. I think the more practice the students would have with these harder skills and strategies would help the students to understand and comprehend how to accomplish the objectives of the lesson best.
·        What did you learn so far about implementing your ‘core practice’ and what do you need to do to continue your professional learning?
-So far, I have learned that the core practice of teaching comprehension skills and strategies for some students comes very naturally, where others have trouble implementing these strategies due to unfamiliarity with active reading. To continue my professional learning, I need identify individual students strengths while reading for comprehension and allow them to have more independent work time. This will allow me to free up myself to be more accommodating for the students who need more practice and individual instruction and practice working and learning these new strategies and skills.

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Week of 10-15-12 Post...Just a bit later though

Very sorry about the late post you guys.  This was kind of the last thing on my mind this week.  I looked at Chapters 10 and Chapter 14 from the Strategies Book.  Chapter 10 focused on figuring out the importance of texts.  This chapter was very informative in that it gave many ideas that we could use for our own lessons.  Although I am doing Fables, there were some really good ideas about Nonfiction texts.  It gave ideas about creating links and how to show the importance to students for this type of genre.  It also gave the idea abut effective highlighting strategies.  It says that they need to read the text, highlight it, think about it, and make conscious decision about what they need to remember.  I am actually using this strategy within my Unit.  I am using Guided Reading and Reader's Theater as Centers and am having students highlight to help effectively comprehend the texts. Another part of Chapter 10 I liked was the section based on "Coding Important Information on Unfamiliar as Well as Familiar Topics."  This section focused on how how students might be very broad in their understandings of a lot of topics, but it is just as important for them to make similar connections with unfamiliar topics.  Again, with my unit, I will be reading Fables which have morals that most students should be familiar with.  I actually challenged myself to look for Fables that maybe they were unfamiliar with.  If students are able to make connections on unfamiliar texts based off of ideas that they may have learned previously, it will be beneficial to my students.

When looking at Chapter 14 it talks about reading to understand textbooks and how to actively do this. I found this section interesting because we haven't really dug into any textbooks.  With the MEAP review, we have only done stuff out of those workbooks.  I feel that understanding how to read a textbook and take the most out of it is really important though.  The book talks about "merging student thinking with textbook information in the same way we have them merge their thinking in other texts."  This is sometimes hard though because of how structured textbooks can be.  I do not use Reading Street, but I know you guys do.  How do you think you can make reading out of a textbook fun?  Especially when it's so scripted?  What practices have you found useful when it comes to contextually understanding works right from a textbook?

Monday, October 8, 2012

10/11 Post: Authentic Questions

As the reading states, authentic questions are great strategies for both teachers and students to use to challenge the thinking of students. When questions authentic and open ended, students must articulate the thoughts that naturally come to them as an answer, and really think and explain why they are responding to the question that way. When students challenge their own thinking for why they have come to a conclusion by explaining, not only are they providing a more detailed answer, but they are helping others to understand their thinking as well.

On page 123, the strategy of having the students ask "lingering questions" after finishing a reading, where the students stop and think about some things about the text that they are still wondering about. I think this is great strategy, because instead of just having the reading finished as the goal, this challenges the students to think beyond the text about what else might be missing, or what other thinking can stem from a reading. I think the best way to expose these lingering questions would be to hold a free discussion amongst the students where they are free to ask these lingering questions to the other students. By asking the other students, rather than just the teacher, the students can begin to understand how other students interpret texts in different ways and may have similar or different questions. As the students perform this discussion, it would be great if the students would then challenge each other's thinking by asking good authentic questions (such as "can you elaborate more about your thinking").

What do agree with this strategy for exposing lingering questions? Can you think of other and possibly better ways to work with lingering questions? What makes you think that another way would work better, or why do you agree strategy?